Tristan Leask wrote:
Hmm sounds good but I am not using the Stonefield kit.
Currently in the systems running at the moment we have a chkfiles
program that keeps the data structures correct. But this is just suited
to dbfs.
At the moment I am tinkering with my own n-Tier design (building from
scratch to learn). I want to do something similar as to what we were
doing before but using the data layer to alter tables.
One thought I had was to either have a generic checkfiles() in the app
object or possible put a checkfiles() in each biz object, thus they
would look after there own files. The second route I think is going to
end up in more complicated maintenance and probably just will not work.
I'm sure this sort of thing would have been done by someone (and tested
etc). That's why I went for Stonefield. I would not have to reinvent
the wheel and it gave me other benefits (like a reindex function etc)
Peter
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
