Terminal Server (MS Terminal Server) is probably out of the question. VNC might be sellable. But, I think of that as basically TS (Terminal Server of another flair). Feel free t correct me here.
They currently are running Citrix and we're moving that direction. Is that just an expensive TS??? Thanks, George On 7/6/06, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rather than sharing a dbf over the internet, you can set up a terminal server and have the application run remotely. This works well for us. --- George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to allocate a native VFP DBF > (read/write) over the internet? > > If so, what would such a command look like and what > are the risks. > > This is new territory to me. > > TIA > > George > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com
[excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
