Well,

I Googled for this last night and found several SDK hings that looked 
like they ought to be solutions in the $100-1000 range with no 
further "royalty", though I mostly assumed that when a couple said 
it.

I was only really interested in "signing" pdf's with a serial number, 
but most of these seemed do have *lot's* of doohickeys to play with, 
including what they were calling security, but I didn't look further.

I downloaded something that would put any text I wanted at the main 
points (could pick vertical and horizontal top/middle/bottom 
separately) on each page, I get to pick fonts, colours, sizes, input 
and output filenames.  It's free and small (360-ish k), but obviously 
manual.  Not too bad for a few or a few dozen at a push.  Also seemed 
pretty quick, a second or two to write on thirty-six pages & rewrite 
the file.  Not fast I s'pose, but not bad.

We publish every other month, and I'm hoping to have hundreds if not 
thousands to send out, but they can chunter away overnight, both 
creating and sending.  Local processor power is probably cheaper than 
web server power :-)

I think we're in a slightly different situation.  A book is a one hit 
thing that's big enough to warrant "stealing" and selling.  Each 36 
page magazine possibly isn't worth it, particularly if we can add 
some other corporate gubbins in to make it more worth subscribing 
that pirating, but I'm sure we'll "lose" some.  We already do, our 
readership is likely to be more than double our subscription level.

I expect it'll be sensible to settle for making it difficult rather 
than trying to cure the problem.

Regards
Mark




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to