! ! Unlike Bush, she feels passionate about her cause, she has no ulterior ! motive other than to make the world a better place. She has ! seen first ! hand where violence and intolerance lead to. She has seen ! terorism via ! the IRA. Yes, she is angry, and who the hell can blame her. ! Your Bush ! is solely driven by greed and a desire for omnipotence. !
If she were a Republican or a conservative Ed would be blasting her for being a hypocrite---preaching love and peace and save-the-children in one breath, but really full of hate inside and hardly able to contain it in another breath. The Nobel Peace Prize long ago became a joke, a place where lefties of various stripes, colors and nationalities hang out to pat each other on the back for being excellent humanists and cross-dress their hate as noble indignation. It's done nothing for peace or tolerance. All someone has to do apparently is talk the talk of peace and love, and they have a whole band of collectively unconscious choir boys and girls who coo and guffaw over their every witticism and defend their hate on supposedly "humanitarian" grounds, even as they make the wildest most libelous accusations about Bush and the dreaded neo-cons (simply "tags" for the dirty, conniving, omnipotent Jew archtetype, to use Bill's Jungian wanna-be terminology). - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
