> From: Michael Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Good points...thanks, Steve. There's not many columns, so I'll consider > that. As for naming conventions, you're right. I wish there were > "packages" in SQL Server like there are in Oracle. The Oracle packages > allow you to organize a bit better, imo. Why M$ never adopted that, I > can't understand why (unless it's a copyright issue or something)??????
In 2005 it's much different. I don't have any real Oracle experience to compare the two in a case like this. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
