> From: MB Software Solutions General Account > > >http://www.cagle.com/working/060829/thompson.jpg > > > > > > > LOL! Someone along time ago said we should put Bill Clinton as the > leader of the UN. What say you to that?
We can't take out John Bolton. Bwahahahahaha What a fool our president is to show the world that as a top nation we can't even approve of the lip service that Bush places in in-term. Wow take that middle east. Bolton has been there for what a year and close to a half. Probably go through the end of the Bush dynasty as an in-term. Oh hell why not read why he could never get confirmed: http://www.fcnl.org/issues/item_print.php?item_id=1245&issue_id=113 If the U.N. secretary building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference. (Global Structures Convocation, Feb. 3, 1994) Old but still a POV none the less. Diplomacy is not an end [in] itself if it does not advance U.S. interests. (Los Angeles Times, March 8, 2005) Now back to Clinton. I don't think that he could be effective there. I think he would mean well, but in the end he could not summon the other powers to reflect a goal that would also benefit the USA. He would be very vocal, and probably bore the crap out of many an international in any long winded speech. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
