Exactly. With that logic, Atheists can call him a liar for saying that God exists.
--- john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To lie means to knowingly make a false statement. A > statement that is made, > based on faulty information, is not necessarily a > lie. It's the old truth > tables from Logic 101. The conclusions he reached > were the same as the > Democrats who were given the same information and > voted FOR the war. Why are > we continuing to plow this same ground. The decision > to go to war was > bi-partisan. The data was flawed, but both parties > voted based on it. That > data came from multiple sources, not just U.S. > Intel. We are at war, get > over it. > > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Anthony L. Testi > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:30 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie > > Are (some) people upset because they think President > Bush lied to them for > the reasons we went into Iraq? If so was it because > they belived what they > think he said and felt that we should go, later > finding out that it was a > 'lie' so felt betrayed? Or maybe they 'knew' it was > a lie at the start and > therefore we should of not gone, lie or not. Is it > the 'lying' or the going > that has (some) people upset? I assume there is a > mixture, and of course > other 'solutions' other then the two I just listed > exist. > > I'm doing my best to be a 'martian' and observe this > somewhat detacted. > > Here in Eugene OR. (Where I am living) there seems > to a large number of > people ( at least vocal, e.g. street protests, > letters to the editors etc. ) > that shall we be kind and say disagree with mush of > the presidents policys, > and I am trying very much to understand their > thinking, but it is hard for > me to follow the lack of facts. I've asked about > the 'lying' and I have not > yet received a clear answer. (Maybe Ed's recent > post will provide me with > that information when I've read it or the links he > has provided.) I can > appreciate people putting different weights on the > facts, e.g. I believe > that Oil was a reason for going into Iraq thou I put > little weight on it, > Person X may say that Oil was a primary reason for > going into Iraq. I on > the other hand would put much more weight onto the > UN resoluions then say > the 'other' person. > > A small favor, I really do not like the name calling > in policts. No I am > not going to ask for others here to stop, I'm not > that much of a fool ( ok > I've just called myself a name. ) If you see me > doing it please point in > out, I'm trying to stop myself. > > Anthony L. Testi > > > > > > Anthony L. Testi > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
