>> Some people don't like the fact that indentation matters

To me, this was a poor design decision.  I can't see NASA using Python for
anything . . . "Well, the reason the first human mission to Mars failed was
because someone accidentally deleted a Tab character, didn't notice it, and
the landing program behaved differently than originally speced out."  Ok,
that's an extreme example, but the behavior of my programs matters just as
much to my clients.  At least with block delimiters like ENDIF, you and the
program always know when a statement will execute even when someone has
accidentally changed indentation.  It's as bad a design flaw as
case-sensitivity.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Python - Thinking Differently


On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:45:44 -0400, "MB Software Solutions"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> 
> Ed -- what's the CON or downside of using Python?  
> Seriously...everything has a weak point...what is Python's?
> 

Some people don't like the fact that indentation matters in Python
<shrug>, wouldn't bother me though.

For me it's the lack of something like VFP or Visual Studio - a
comprehensive, cross-platform way to create fat-client GUI-based apps,
with easy refactoring, data binding and so on. Which is of course what
Dabo will ultimately provide!
-- 
  Alan Bourke
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
  http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to