It is funny how Pelosi stood up for Clinton and Condit, but somehow Foley isn't her pervert, so she's not supporting him.
--- Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 02 October 2006 20:33, Ed Leafe wrote: > > ...of a typical liberal smear attack! > > > > > <http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/theangryliberal/001> > > Hi Ed! > > It is old news, so yesterday already. The guy > resigned, get over it. It isn't > as though he actually did something on the job, in > the workplace, with a > subordinate and then repeatedly lied about it to the > point where he had to be > impeached. > > What, after all, does "is" mean anyway? > > Regards, > > Pete > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
