> > Footnote: how I can know these things and still be so broke is
another 
> > discussion :)
> 
> Bill, you took the words out of my mouth...<s>


Changed this to OT. Even though the subject starts with business, it
ends with politics.

First problem: I tend to perfectionism. Unlike Bill Gates who had no
problem releasing buggy software, I look at the bug list and wouldn't
even think about shipping my product until it's wiped out. But, so not
as to bash myself too much, I have harnessed, by design, the essence of
what's important to small business database applications (big statement,
but I can back it up).

That's one thing. Lesson learned - but ignored still: the staggering
price of perfectionism.

Second problem: I have developed a real distaste with how capitalism has
progressed. I see a big Monopoly game going on, with all the railroads
and Park Place's long ago swallowed by now deeply entrenched hegemonies
with an insatiable appetite for more - and more and more. We know that
capitalism never was a fair game but that it did work better then the
alternatives. I think some of the "truths" that existed when the subject
was up for debate years ago (e.g. Ayn Rand's heyday) have changed. For
example, the need for checks and balances has degenerated to mere lip
service as companies like Wal-Mart trample manufacturing, and Big Guns
like Verizon walk slipshod over customers (I've got a perfect story to
illustrate this right now!)

I know there are those who say wealth should be redistributed - and
others who say that if it were, it would only wind up back where it is
today, but the older I get the more I side with redistribution. It's the
hegemonies, the empires, that have grown so deep and large as to be out
of touch with our reality - yet demand and require our loyalty and
allegiance. People seem to be fooled so much they don't even realize
they're fooled anymore. The MI complex, the media, the gov't - are
examples at the top end, of well founded institutions that have
transformed over time into veritable monsters. 

The essential ingredient of this great problem is that these monsters
are organized, and we-the-people are not. We've grown dependent on two
major political parties, only to see them both seized and eaten by
consolidated empires.

We can no longer turn to militia and guns to replace a government gone
sour - as our own Constitution tells us we have the right and obligation
to do - but we must do something. Today the behavior of these monsters
has us standing on a precipice, on the brink, of descent into what we
think is the exclusive providence of the third world. We are witnessing,
in our lifetimes, the once great country that was America spiral into
something that we as children never thought could possibly happen.

I don't even like to think like this, but someone has to: just try to
imagine what will happen with another major attack on this country. I
not only see the ease with which this can happen,  but at least two
great consequences: (1) the end of privacy and freedom as we finalize
the transformation into a police state, and (2) disruption of systems,
even just milk delivery in cities, that creates, through the panic such
relatively small events can spark, further disruptions as confidence as
systems tilt. History teaches us that countries in such trouble are then
vulnerable to "strong" leadership, aka dictatorship, but that's the
opposite of what we really want and need.

We've been insulated for too long from the third of the world that
doesn't even have drinkable water and is being torn apart by disease and
blights. Today we're focused on wiping out the militants these
conditions create, oblivious to the conditions themselves, while our
rulers - the very ones with so much power they have completely lost
touch with reality - reassure us that all is well and we just have to
stay the course. They couldn't be more wrong.

I got into computers because I saw how fantastic they are early on. It
was easy to see the two-edged sword, but it was also easy to have
confidence that our system would make sure they would be used for good
things. I've since lost that confidence and now see the computer
proposition as something we better get a handle on before they are
misused to the extreme (e.g. those dossiers on us - are all too real).



Bill

 
> A+
> jml
> (btw. PowerPoint has a lot to answer for)



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to