How did Obama get vetted with close ties to Weather Underground mastermind Bill 
Ayers? 

--- On Fri, 7/1/11, John Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: John Harvey <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [OT] Huma is a 'slimmie
> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, July 1, 2011, 1:22 AM
> If she works for the secretary of
> state, regardless as to political party,
> she should have been vetted by the FBI. Her association and
> relationship
> with the muslim bros should cause her employment to be
> terminated.
> 
> John
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf
> Of geoff
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:14 AM
> To: 'ProFox Email List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Huma is a 'slimmie
> 
> While I see the point, I wonder if any of you remember the
> "committee on
> un-american activities' in the 50s. Seems like you might be
> moving back to
> the same era with the same blinkers on. 'guilt by
> association' is the worst
> possible kind of guilt. It might as well be guilt by colour
> or religion
> which interestingly enough, has been used before. There are
> risks in
> sticking to your principles, but there are also rewards.
> One of them is
> 'freedom'.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf
> Of Pete Theisen
> Sent: Friday, 1 July 2011 2:33 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: [OT] Huma is a 'slimmie
> 
> Hi Everybody,
> 
> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44549
> 
> "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's aide and Deputy Chief
> of Staff Huma
> Abedin, who has been with Clinton since 1996.  She was
> never properly
> screened, this will be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
> 
> "To be concerned about Abedin's access to sensitive
> information is an issue
> that will most likely garner unsolicited curses from
> "sensitive" 
> Americans who are enamored with her.  These same
> people ignore this diva's
> familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.  Lt. Col.
> Robert Anderson's
> detailed reports aimed at getting Army intelligence to
> investigate Ali
> Mohamed-and have him court-martialed-were also ignored.
> 
> "Abedin is even more potentially dangerous:  She can
> leak state secrets. 
>   She is closely associated with her Muslim
> Brotherhood family and even
> joined Clinton at an event with her mother, Saleha Abedin,
> at Dar El-Hekma
> College in Saudi Arabia.  Also present was a close
> associate of Saleha
> Abedin-Suheir Qureshi.  Qureshi's name later appeared
> in several prominent
> Arab newspapers when it was revealed that she belonged to a
> list of 63
> members of the secret arm of the Muslim Brotherhood called
> The Sisterhood.
> The full list was later revealed-Huma Abedin's mother is on
> it.  Huma's
> brother-Hassan Abedin-also collaborates with Omar Naseef
> and Sheikh Yusuf
> al-Qaradawi, two of the most influential terror supporters
> in the world.
> 
> "Yet, as detractors argue "guilt by association," they
> unwittingly
> strengthen our case, because this is what the FBI uses when
> investigating
> federal employees:  "Character. 
> Associates.  Reputation. 
>   And Loyalty to the United States. 
> (CARL)."  This checklist was never
> applied to Huma Abedin, who still associates with her
> family. 
> Dismissing all this as "guilt by association" ignores a
> tough question:
> 
> "Other than Huma Abedin, has there ever been a case in
> which a family member
> who either belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood or was a
> prominent Islamist
> did not denounce a Muslim female relative who married a
> non-Muslim male?
> 
> "It's a question with only one answer:  Her family
> made an exception for her
> because Huma has a higher calling."
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Pete
> http://pete-theisen.com/
> http[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to