On 7/9/2011 3:13 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > On 7/8/2011 10:02 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> Why would you pigeon hole yourself into desktop only and not take >> advantage of single code base for web or desktop? >> >> I know that there is a huge diff between a GUI for browsers and for >> desktops so I wonder how they say it can work either way. Obvious WAG >> is that it is all for Web and their desktop client is a custom >> browser??? > > Good question, Stephen. > > Since Servoy is a framework, the best way would be to have a 3-tier > architecture with two sets of UI objects, one for desktop and one for > browsers. Same as alternative data objects for different DBs. > > But I don't know enough about Servoy to know what they actually do.
Insert Thierry's new Fox In Cloud product here....take the Fox to the web! (No, I haven't tried it yet, but the idea just thrills the hell out of me. If I read it right, it can take what you've got and work for much of it without a complete or major rewrite. Getting your Visual Fox apps to work on the web pretty much as they are....that really does sound too good to be true.) -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
