Nobody has come out in favor of ending medicare and medicaid

----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Jeurink <[email protected]>
To: 'ProFox Email List' <[email protected]>
Cc: 
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 4:00 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] The Bill Clinton Budget Act of 2011

Problem is ... I had a catastrophic accident in 1983 and I am alive because of 
medicare and Medicaid. Take em away and I'll be dead in about a month!

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Buckland [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:23 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] The Bill Clinton Budget Act of 2011

Exactly, now what has grown in the last 12 years that can be cut... 

Inflation... pesky little thing can't get rid of that
Oh a recession that has cut tax revenues and increased federal spending
Yup stop spending on Iran and Iraq.. pull the troups back.. that'll get some 
votes
Well might as well close the camp at Gitmo... save a fortune on orange boiler 
suits... send them all back to Iran / Pakistan / Afghanistan
Homeland Security.. hell no need for that when we're looking to save money... 
just make sure everyone can carry a gun and then no one will dare attack us.
Education and healthcare... let everyone provide for themselves.. "there is no 
such thing as society"
Care for seniors... shit they should of provided for themselves... low paid 
jobs .. well tough..

Next?







-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Pete Theisen
Sent: 02 August 2011 13:36
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [OT] The Bill Clinton Budget Act of 2011

Hi Everybody,

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45242

Democrats incessantly boast that “Bill Clinton balanced the budget.” 
Since they give him so much credit for this achievement, and have never been 
known to describe President Clinton​ as heartless and cruel to the helpless 
dependents of Big Government, they can hardly denounce his levels of government 
spending as “irresponsible” or “balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.”

<snip>

Clinton spent only $1.7 trillion in 1999.  The Obama budget baseline is a 
staggering $3.7 trillion.  The CBO would score a return to Clinton levels of 
spending as a $20 trillion spending “cut.”

<snip>

This proposal has it all – and by simply proposing it, Republicans would raise 
awareness about the absurdity of baseline budgeting.

Even if the Bill Clinton Budget Act of 2011 dies in the House, the arguments 
against it would be highly educational for a public that thinks the phrase 
“spending cut” means something entirely different than its Beltway meaning.  
The public is, quite literally, not even speaking the same language as its 
ruling class.  Bill Clinton would make an excellent translator.
--
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9308AA7C9F614F58BFA108D0FDFCD5AA@OwnerPC
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to