Michael Madigan wrote: > If in 2011 they're still too stupid to develop their own toilets, why bother?
Hi Michael, I remember a gig I had in the early 70s in Public Housing. It was my job to tell the, ahem, residents, to clean up their garbage. Their personalities vary widely, and some of them I liked and considered friends. However, they have an entirely different culture concerning waste. While I was talking to one of the ladies I noticed that she was unconsciously sifting garbage through her bare toes - like a girl from my culture would play with sand on the beach. I think the third world people like sh*t all over the ground. > And what is wrong with trying to eliminate " 40 percent of the world's > population - about 2.9 billion people - doesn't have regular access to > any kind of toilet" > > It's their money and they are trying to do good with it in the > developing world.... > http://blogs.forbes.com/eco-nomics/2011/07/28/gates-foundation-wants-to- > reinvent-the-toilet/?partner=obtech > > I have first hand had a brush with M$ "charity" as in "Give us $40K (a > great discount!) and we won't sue you." This latest scheme only *looks* > innocent. > > What they are really after is money from everyone in the third world. > The third world needs to tell them to eat their sh*t. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
