http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&source=hp&q=multiple+users+windows+7+remote+desktop+hack&pbx=1&oq=multiple+users+windows+7+remote+desktop+hack&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=462l9315l1l9561l33l31l2l5l7l1l478l3810l3.17.3.0.1l24l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=c313f2edd24fc65d&biw=1366&bih=663


There are several entries.

I should do it with one of my systems too


________________________________
From: Sytze de Boer <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: RDT and Windows XP Prof

Where do we find such a hack?


On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]>wrote:

> There is a registry hack for this.  I haven't tried it but supposedly it
> works fine.  You just need a computer powerful enough to serve 2 users at
> the same time.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rafael Copquin <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:07 PM
> Subject: RDT and Windows XP Prof
>
> I need to connect to an XP Prof box at the same time a local user is
> using the machine, without interrupting his session.
>
> The scenario is this:
>
> One XP Prof box issuing over-the-counter invoices at a store.
> People at head office accessing that computer and updating the software
> databases with new products, price changes, etc.
> Both have to use the computer at the same time, without the RDT guy
> kicking the local guy out of his sesssion.
>
> This is perfectly doable with Windows Server 2003/2008. But, how is it
> done with Windows XP Professional?
>
> [excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to