Dan Covill wrote: > On 10/12/11 15:04, Pete Theisen wrote: >> So she was lying about sneaking out? What are the chances of a >> left-liberal colored lady lying? > > You know, Pete, it seems that every time I get close to deciding you're > really a pretty decent guy that's gone through some hard times, I trip > over one of these racist turds you've left on the carpet. :-((
Hi Dan, It is racism to suggest that colored people should not be called out for their habits - particularly this one. Their culture is part of them and explains their behavior, but their habits are still flawed beyond culture's ability to excuse. That said, how about Herman Cain? He is "blacker" than either of these two (Bammer and the first shopper) yet he is resonating with people and so far ringing true. If he gets the R nod will that be "racism"? If he misses it by "that much"? If he wins November 2012? My take on it is that it is not the color, but the behavior. People stereotype because the stereotypes are true, however "racist" the truth might be. However, the stereotypes do not speak of individuals in the same way their own behavior does. "Racist turd", eh? Now that IS colorful! However, what ARE the chances of a left-liberal colored lady lying? Clever ducking still leaves the question unanswered . . . -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
