Nicholas Geti wrote:
> If it is wrong biologically then that particular gene should die out 
> wouldn't you think? 

THIS from Mr. Global Warming Science? It couldn't be that fagotism isn't 
genetic, could it? They were so sure a few years ago that they had the 
gene, but they couldn't repeat the result. Surely you remember that.

> So what is going on that every animal species does it? 

I have been saying for years that fagots are animals.

> If there was no outlet for the sex drive from these individuals who are so 
> inclined, we would see more rage from them. So let them feel good about 
> themselves and keep them out of my way.

Right. Exile to fagotobia, or Devil's Island.

> It's wrong biologically, not necessarily morally. Supporting Gay marriage is 
> like supporting blind driving, it just doesn't make any logical sense except 
> that it makes some people feel better about themselves.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to