Nicholas Geti wrote: > You are making too many twisted assumptions here to sort out your questions.
Hi Nicholas, Twisted assumptions as in getting close to home. >> Nicholas Geti wrote: >>> Like I said...too many of my friends go postal on this topic. There is no >>> rhyme or reason to it. >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> Any chance your friends are right? What are the chances of that? >> >> Consider that they were on me like stink on sh*t until I turned 21 and >> then stopped. Once of legal age I was of no interest to them. Not that >> they are all pedophiles or anything, of course, it was "just weather". >> >> Consider the ridiculous "can't help themselves" argument. If that were >> really so they would be getting beheaded ten and twenty a day in the >> Islamic world, would they not? However, since it is actually a mere >> "lifestyle choice" there is no such problem at all, they simply choose >> to be straight - a choice all "gays" have, all the time. >> >>>> Nicholas Geti wrote: >>>>> If it is wrong biologically then that particular gene should die out >>>>> wouldn't you think? >>>> THIS from Mr. Global Warming Science? It couldn't be that fagotism isn't >>>> genetic, could it? They were so sure a few years ago that they had the >>>> gene, but they couldn't repeat the result. Surely you remember that. >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Pete >> http://pete-theisen.com/ >> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
