On 11/17/11 09:40, Jarvis, Matthew wrote: > IIRC correctly it was something of an incomprehensible mess... but then again > maybe I just got lost in the details or frustrated that I couldn't get it > (the code) to do what I wanted... >
I forgot to mention that part. <g> Matthew is correct! Dan Covill _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
