MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote on 2011-11-22: > On 11/22/2011 2:43 AM, Paul Hill wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:09 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> No offense to Les, as his contributions are great, but the WPF screens >>> don't like much more appealing (if at all) than the VFP forms, imo. >>> That's just a stylistic comment, and has nothing to do with Les and his >>> tool. >> >> WPF screens don't 'feel' like Windows applications. Controls are >> non-standard, fonts are rendered differently etc. >> That's why I went the older WinForms route. >> > > > Seems like WPF is change for the sake of change, and not necessarily > PROGRESS. > > Ugh.
Mike, The benefit that will help our users is the ability to make the screen resize the font without the screen becoming weird. I have a lot of users that see odd problems with grids and labels overlapping controls because the Windows System settings. WPF uses containers much like the, as I remember, Dabo forms. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
