On 12/14/2011 12:52 PM, Jarvis, Matthew wrote: > In the past I've done it the brute force way of just opening the SCX and > scanning through it making the changes I needed... > > BUT seeing Dave's posting about putting things over into sub-classes > makes a lot of sense to me... isn't that how you would want to do things > anyway? Might as well kill two birds with one stone...
On that note, I'll throw a reminder about Rick Schummer's HackCX tool: http://whitelightcomputing.com/prodhackcxpro.htm -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
