Nicholas Geti wrote: > http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/science/earth/new-speculation-on-who-leaked-climate-change-e-mails.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha22 > > Article gives history of attack on integrity of global-warming scientists and > their vindication. Now a new wave of emails have brought in the international > police to find the culprits.
Hi Nicholas, So, the evidence was obtained surreptitiously so that means the crooks get off and the cops get punished. Typical. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
