Here is a link to explain the 300,000 which Newt paid him self with a loan
he took out. And explains he was not forced out but resigned for the good of
the party.
 
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/22/ethics-penalty-reimbursement
-says-gingrich/



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Michael Madigan
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:55 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Newt was accurate

Watch this CNN report at the time and it will become clear that Newt did
nothing wrong.  This was payback by the Dems. 




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMpBBRUCMd8


________________________________
From: Pete Theisen <[email protected]>
To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Newt was accurate

Michael Madigan wrote:
> And he got Clinton impeached and almost expelled. 

Hi Michael,

I wish it had been horseshoes . . .

> Newt was not fined nor censored on ethics matters. It was the Democrats
who tried to stop him because he was so instrumental in getting Republicans
elected which reduced the power of the Democrats.
> 
>
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-refutes-ethics-fine/2012/01/25/id/4
25485
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/A87404377CA54E2696A31726681E70A7@jerryfootePC
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to