What the hell are you talking about?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Lindner" <[email protected]> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 4:24 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Now David Brookes is talking > So, if I earn $10 a year and pay $10 to go to a federal park, that means I > pay 100% of my income in taxes? Wow! > > As for the feds cutting taxes. Suppose they cut 200 from a program that > would have increased by 1,000. So, it was "cut" by 20%. Wow again. > > Carl Lindner > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 3:45 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Now David Brookes is talking > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: > >> Past Fox news, or CBS, are there real facts to drive this probable >> fiction? I am sure there is a lot of bias in this news. > > The focus on *income* tax is largely accurate: there is a minimum > income level for each family size under which you do not owe taxes. > However, > these people pay a lot of federal taxes, just not as income tax. The > numbers > that I have seen show that the lower your income, the larger the > percentage > of it goes to the federal government when you count all forms of taxes, > fees, etc. > > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/66774B4D6E83450585D60ACDB1977F2C@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
