On Mar 2, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Dan Covill wrote:
> And what is the basis for that assertion? It may be impossible to reach
> an 'agreement' on matters of faith, but surely it is possible to have a
> 'rational exchange' of viewpoints.
Perhaps, but not a discussion about it. The point of "faith" is that
you have suspended critical thought about the matter, and have accepted
something without question. It is thus impossible to participate in a
back-and-forth with someone who doesn't agree with you ahead of time.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
