geoff wrote: > I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being > impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who has > literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish have human > rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate president - if indeed > ever.
Hi Geoff, As a matter of fact, we still support Bush. Much rather have Bush be an unofficial ambassador than, say, Carter - yet Carter is the one who usurps the role. Bush was at times inarticulate, Bammer is something else. Inexplicable, I think - or worse, suspect. Is the movie already out in Oz? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Pete Theisen > Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:03 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand > > Hi Everybody, > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU > > Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
