Only with a 2 party system or single transferable vote would you get normally an overall majority.
I can't remember when the UK had a prime minister with > 50% of the vote as the Liberals get about 20% and the socialists about 35% -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 19 March 2012 10:59 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch? Not a single First-world country has elected a minority to President or Prime Minister, that I'm aware of, except the dummies right here in the USA. Peru elected Fujimori, but Peru isn't a First-world country. OK Kids, can you name one? Don't tell me South Africa because Blacks didn't have the right to vote. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ricardo Araoz <[email protected]> To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:27 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch? El 19/03/12 03:47, Michael Madigan escribió: > After you elect a Aborigine criminal President, then you can call us > names. He is a first-class criminal thug. So you mean they are allowed a *criminal* president, so long as he is not aboriginal? [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
