We're using FPW databases.
----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Quilhot <[email protected]> To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:43 PM Subject: Re: Is there a problem with VFP 9.0 and FPW 2.6 accessing the same database? Check out http://support.microsoft.com/kb/130461 about the checnges in the header record. Rick Q [email protected] On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]>wrote: > OK, great. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Fred Taylor <[email protected]> > To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:39 PM > Subject: Re: Is there a problem with VFP 9.0 and FPW 2.6 accessing the > same database? > > I do it all the time with an FPD2.6 and VFP9 apps. > > Fred > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Michael Madigan <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I seem to remember reading this somewhere and now I can't find the > > reference. This is just until our program is completely conv[excessive > > quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
