Yup, that's one of the papers that I read to help me decide what to do. This is what I do:
Multiuser system speed 1. Set OPLocks off for increased speed in multiuser systems HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRXSmb\Parameters\ set OplocksDisabled = 1 OplocksDisabled REG_DWORD 0 or 1 Default: 0 (not disabled) 2. HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters SharingViolationRetries REG_DWORD 0?1000 attempts Default: 5 Determines the maximum number of times the Server service attempts a file operation when the file system responds with a sharing violation error. If a client requests more attempts that the value of this entry allows, the Server service returns an error. This value entry applies to open, rename, and delete operations. Note Windows NT does not add this value to the Registry. You can add it by editing the Registry or by using a program that edits the Registry. SharingViolationDelay REG_DWORD 0?1000 milliseconds Default: 200 Determines the time interval between repeated requests for a file operation when the file system responds with a sharing violation error. This value entry applies to open, rename, and delete operations. Decreasing this value (requesting more frequently) increases network traffic. However, increasing this value (requesting less frequently) might delay users unnecesarily. Note Windows NT does not add this value to the Registry. You can add it by editing the Registry or by using a program that edits the Registry. Frank. Frank Cazabon On 18/04/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Kaye wrote: > http://www.dataaccess.com/whitepapers/opportunlockingreadcaching.html > > -- > rk > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Frank Cazabon > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Does opp locks on clients need to be turned off too to prevent > index corruption? > > I turn it off to speed up multi user system access, never heard of corruption > problems with it on. I have heard about smb2 causing index corruption > > On 17 Apr 2012 18:57, "Michael Madigan"<[email protected]> wrote: > > would that include temp files? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul McNett<[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Tu... > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the > author, and do not cons... > Report [OT] Abuse: > http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/[email protected] > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
