Adam Buckland wrote: > And 43.5 mpg from the short wheel base.... > > http://www.ford.co.uk/Commercialvehicles/Transit/Models-and-Prices/tabid=tab4 > > To be fair though we have the standard 150BHP version in our land rover and > it gets 30mpg over average road conditions but half that over rough terain....
Hi Adam, We don't have those models over here. How do they keep the AC running with the engine shut off? > Adam Buckland wrote: >> 39.8 mpg for the ECOnetic version.... things have moved on since yours >> Pete.... > Really? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECOnetic > > Somehow, I don't see any van models . . . > >> 25% More fuel efficient? They will get 13 MPG instead of the 10 mine got? >> >> http://wot.motortrend.com/not-for-us-ford-transit-custom-cargo-van-launching-in-europe-194279.html -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
