Stephen Russell wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Pete Theisen <petethei...@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> Surely you must know the issue is much, much bigger than a simple >> preference of this degenerate 1 or 2 percent of the people. It involves >> the redefining of a most sacred concept, which we have no right to do >> for future generations.
> It is a deflection for the election, nothing more. Get everyone > yelling at one another about stupid stuff and the real pain of today > is forgotten. We could be yelling abut how pathetic job growth has > been. Instead we are yelling about adding a check line to the 1040 > Filing Status Couple of Queers. > > This becomes a tax break for gay people who live together who cannot > file Married Joint Return. > > Next it becomes a huge headache for medical systems on their > definition of who can visit a patient as well as make decisions about > that person. > > Last point is if God didn't like gays Jesus would have spoken against it. Of course you edited my "Civil Partnership" remark. I don't recall there being any push to redefine whatever term they were using for "marriage" back in Jesus' days. Back then the 1 - 2% were content to privately sodomize and infect each other without public endorsement. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fabdaaa.5080...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
