On 05/06/12 23:51, Nicholas Geti wrote: > See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/idiot?s=t for definition of > "idiot"
But it was YOU who started talking about MY definition of idiot. So to now come up with a dictionary is, shall we say, idiotic. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ricardo Araoz" <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 6:09 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] Can't lie well enough or fast enough > > >> On 05/06/12 10:20, Nicholas Geti wrote: >>> Your definition of idiot is a lot different than mine. >> My definition is pretty simple. >> Anyone who states that NO idiot can get rich is, by definition, an idiot. >> If he also thinks that ANY idiot that inherits it will loose it, then he >> is by definition an idiot squared. >> >> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ricardo Araoz" <[email protected]> >>> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:08 AM >>> Subject: Re: [OT] Can't lie well enough or fast enough >>> >>> >>>> On 24/05/12 15:57, Nicholas Geti wrote: >>>>> But you called her an idiot. Idiots don't get rich and if they inherit >>>>> it >>>>> they lose it fast. >>>>> >>>> That's an idiotic statement. >>>> Idiots do get rich. And if they inherit it, some of them don't loose it >>>> fast enough. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
