On 6/20/2012 5:57 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Why you'd use @SAY/GET in VFP7??? I didn't use it! Its an old, OLD
> system - starting way back as Foxbase+ or FP for DOS. I didn't build it
> - I only support it - and add new features. Many times - if it's a
> completely new screen - I will actually make it graphical as a Form.
>
> The idea of using " FOR EACH oObject in thisform.Controls " sounds
> exactly what I was looking for. Any place you can point me to in the
> Help files for more specific details? As I've definitely not ever done
> that particular type of code before...
>
> Thanks again,
> Kurt


Check out the FOR EACH in VFP Help.  It's in there.  Likewise, you 
should consider putting something in the Init of your classes used in 
the form so that you're only registering the controls that you really 
want to scan/check/work-with.  That avoids you cycling through tons of 
controls for no reason at all.  There's a pattern name for that but it 
escapes me at the moment.

For example, in your txtKurt.Init class method, you'd have the following 
code:

if this.lRegister then
   thisform.AddToCollectionToCheck(this)
endif

And of course that means you'd have a custom property called lRegister 
that you set to .T. if you cared about that object on the screen being 
included in your check/work-with-it routine.  Then in your frmKurt form 
class, you'd have a custom method called AddToCollection that received 
the object as a parameter and added it to the form's collection (using 
some custom property like oControlsToCheck that was a collection object).

Then when you needed to work with those controls that you really cared 
about, you could cycle through that collection.  example:  FOR EACH 
oObject in thisform.oMyControls

This is all out of my head, but I think it should work.

(And yes, I still prefer the old Hungarian notation for form property 
names.  Insert mockery here!  lol)


-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to