On 07/03/2012 10:16 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: > On 07/03/2012 10:46 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> Please also note that Pete is still perfectly free to post OT stuff. >> Nothing has changed in that regard. The only thing that's changed is >> that for the next two weeks none of his posts will be sent to the >> ProFoxTech subscribers. > Hi Ed, > > I understood your action and on reflection I see that I indeed had been > posting replies to an [NF] thread. It has appeared to me that certain > people routinely use [NF] as the "tech" [OT], but I just thought that > since humor and such being tech related, I guess not. > > I had quite forgotten the work bans that some folks have to comply with. > > Beyond that, though, the ferocity of the postings to this thread > indicate to me that none, or nearly none of my postings are considered > funny or even entertaining - THAT is the serious issue. I am not > offended, but I am reassessing, not to inherit the mantle of any of our > other unaccepted or misunderstood friends. > > And yes, I may have been among the misunderstanders. Still, ProFox is > diminished by the withdrawal of the many who have gone away. Out of > respect to the sensitive, though, I will recede.
Step #1 in programming: understand people. - Linus Torvalds on linux-kernel Regards, LelandJ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
