On Oct 23, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
=> -----Original Message-----
=> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth
Kixmoeller/fh
=> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 20:32
=> To: [email protected]
=> Subject: Re: DBF() and GETFILE() no respecters of case
=>
=> Now if we could only convince Hal to trim the quoting on his
=> replies...
=>
=> How about this: Trimming Rocks! <gd&rlh>
=>
=> Ken
=>
Aw, c'mon Ken. Gimme a break! I never know what to do. Top or
bottom? Full or nothing? I try to keep it down, honest! I think
that the list server just isn't in sync with Outlook or vice-
versa. And I am stuck with Outlook, so please don't try to lure me
into using something else. You would be wasting your carpal
bandwidth.
Look at the text you quoted from Ken. How much of it is needed to
understand the context of your reply? Do you really need to tell us
that what you quoted is the "Original Message"? Does repeating the
header information from his post enable anyone to understand your
reply better?
All you need to quote is what you are replying to. Outlook has no
way of knowing this, so it just quotes the entire thing. It is up to
you to be considerate enough to delete the extra crap that Outlook
dumps.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
