Maybe there was really no good reason to retype the implicit fields... On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't understand your "add", can you give a code example? Below I > added 5 to my aggregate but I don't think that is what you mean. > > SELECT > [OBJECT_ID] > ,sum([ATTR_NUMERIC_VALUE]) +5 as FunnyValue > FROM [plm_LNProduction].[dbo].[RING_DOC_CLASSIFICATION_HISTORY] > where ATTR_NAME ='320 Overflow Capacity USL' > group by [OBJECT_ID]
-- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=mjbf9mnaazjraetwdwbrr04b7zmqa-5bwnfahd9yjey...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
