On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Kurt Wendt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matt - its SO TRUE - because, even though EDI is "Supposed" to be a
> Standard - all the Trading partners use or do it slightly differently -
> so we have to end up hard-coding all this Crap in our programs to make
> the EDI stuff work. Its NUTS!
----------------------
4010 and 5010. Yeah I wear the EDI hard hat here as well.
Putting in that separator is pretty easy. I just make the asci
character and put it into the string I am building.
When I read it in it looks like this:
Select Case rootElements(0)
Case "ISA"
cMessage.ISA.ISA01 = rootElements(1)
cMessage.ISA.ISA02 = rootElements(2)
cMessage.ISA.ISA03 = rootElements(3)
cMessage.ISA.ISA04 = rootElements(4)
cMessage.ISA.ISA05 = rootElements(5)
cMessage.ISA.ISA06 = rootElements(6)
cMessage.ISA.ISA07 = rootElements(7)
cMessage.ISA.ISA08 = rootElements(8)
cMessage.ISA.ISA09 = rootElements(9)
cMessage.ISA.ISA10 = rootElements(10)
cMessage.ISA.ISA11 = rootElements(11)
cMessage.ISA.ISA12 = rootElements(12)
cMessage.ISA.ISA13 = rootElements(13)
cMessage.ISA.ISA14 = rootElements(14)
cMessage.ISA.ISA15 = rootElements(15)
cMessage.ISA.ISA16 = rootElements(16)
Writing it out I have it mapped via data to fit the partner.
ISA08 = TP.ReceiverID
ISA09 = NumericDate
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN
901.246-0159 cell
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJvc2=4KHVfcoxdzzqM7HMweanZJ8zRXnsKeH=igtm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
