> Don't even get me started on "32-bit" vs "64-bit" operating systems. > Windows 98 could address every spot on a 128 GB hard drive, so why can't > Windows XP address more than 4 GB of RAM? And even if there is some > technical reason for this (as opposed to deliberate planned > obsolescence):
The CPU could technically address 64GB, XP was capped at 4GB because of driver issues discovered during development, is the official line anyway. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1345888550.16301.140661119368557.54f54...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
