That would make snl as accurate as Obama claiming that he did it. 

Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. 

On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:40 AM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>> On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
>> 
>>>> Please post a link to the video of that, I seem to have missed it :-)
>> 
>> Hi Leland,
>> 
>> So he didn't actually say that, or to put it another way, you lied.
> 
> It was more playful satire  than a lie for illustrative proposes. Kind of 
> like how Saturday Night Live presented a comedic impersonation
> of Mitt Romney claiming he killed Osama Bin Laden.  This skit ran the 
> Saturday after the first debate and was very funny.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> I was illustrating how campaign promises are subject to fate. It was the
>>> Republican Party that made the promise in 1928, that if Herbert Hoover
>>> won the Presidency, there would be “a chicken in every pot, and a car in
>>> every garage.” Hoover won, but he was not able to delivered on the
>>> promise. What was delivered instead was the Great Depression of the 1930s.
>>> 
>>> Romney is currently making promises about big, bold, change. I wouldn't
>>> take that too seriously. He's promising 12 million new jobs. Given he
>>> wants to give the military 2 trillion
>> 
>> Something tells me he didn't say that either. Have the link?
> 
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to