I just read that article and I don't know the guy or even much of the back-story. As a result it was pretty transparent that the write is very pro-republican. Any even half-way bipartisan article might have equated Obama's forcefulness with the last terms experience for the Republicans opposing any and every measure he put forward regardless of its worth. Or at least hinted that perhaps after failing to get the Republicans to negotiate in good faith that he was adopting a more attacking posture.
what it wasnt was an article written without significant bias. -----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Monday, 19 November 2012 12:36 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] 3 words define Obama 2.0 Hi Everybody, http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/16/three-words-to-define-obama-20/?in tcmp=obnetwork "evasive, strident and pugnacious" Benghazi is a big deal. Even the puppy-dog press might not save him this time. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
