Andrew, I never wrote the spec - got side tracked and didn't receive any response from Calvin or Ken regarding their interest in creating a hook between source code and the VFP preprocessor/compiler step.
Disappointing because the effort to implement such hook would seem to be so simple - no impact on VFP user interface or core functionality. And disappointing because EVERYTHING else in VFP can be hooked or customized except hooking the source code stream to the compiler. Disappointing because this feature would allow the community to evolve the language without help from MS. I am interested in revisiting this topic if anyone feels confident that we could persuade Calvin to implement this tiny little feature. Thoughts??? Malcolm <snipped> From: "Andrew MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:01:56 -0400 Subject: Re: VFP++ - back on track again Malcolm, (I'm late jumping in here as well) - I'd love to hear more about this as well. Is it still part of the idea to try and get MS to provide some kind of hook for this? </snipped> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
