I can't even find the original mail about this!  How old?!

Anyway, I'm intrigued what is this VFP++ you are speaking about?

Tristan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andrew MacNeill
Posted At: 26 October 2006 14:02
Posted To: Profox Archive
Conversation: VFP++ - back on track again
Subject: Re: VFP++ - back on track again

Malcolm,

(I'm late jumping in here as well) - I'd love to hear more about this as

well. Is it still part of the idea to try and get MS to provide some 
kind of hook for this?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in 
writing by Marine Software Limited, 
this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential 
and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the 
purpose for which it was sent.
If you are not the intended recipient of this  communication  you should 
destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents.
Please notify the sender immediately of the error. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to