Hmm, let's see:

 742 - (60 + 287) = ??  --- Oh, that is way too hard. <g>

I also question the premise. Sure, the list was started as a Foxpro
resource. But now? Of the people still hanging on, I suspect it is more for
the virtual friendships we have made. I'm surprised how many actual VFP
issues there actually are. How many of us still rely on the Fox as our
primary development tool? How many of us spend the majority of our day
working in it? Of those, is there anyone actually building new programs
with it? Most must be adding features to legacy apps or trying to un-break
stuff that M$ breaks.

I sure don't touch it much. I have several VFP apps I wrote in back in the
early 90s that are still in use. Every once in a while, one of those folks
asks me a question, most likely something like "I can't remember how to
configure a workstation." I have my own billing/scheduling system I wrote
20+ years ago. I have one client (for which I do a project once per year)
which I wrote in VFP. Other than that, I just don't touch it. You?

Ken


On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> At 10:01 2013-05-01, List Administrator Account <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ==============================**====================
>> ProFox List Statistics
>> April 2013
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>  Total Posts: 742
>> (Up 19.48% from March 2013)
>>
>
>      Ed, I suggest adding stats here about the number of non-[OT],
> non-[NF] posts (i.e. the main business of this list).
>
>  Total [OT] Posts: 60
>> (Up 76.47% from March 2013)
>>
>> Total [NF] Posts: 287
>> (Up 86.36% from March 2013)
>>
>
> [snip]
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance: 
> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox<http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox>
> OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**
> listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech>
> Searchable Archive: 
> http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox<http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox>
> This message: 
> http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/<http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/>
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of
> the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the
> obvious.
>


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFyV=L=WXhhrjG4u1x6KX6ZCx8t0mf=+ddtoecpot10v_qf...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to