I think it is because there is not a whole lot of new development going on.

>From what I can tell via my work at Keep America At Work, the corporations (
so far ) seem to still be fairly busy, but they are not doing new
development, for the most part, in vfp.

The mom and pops, if they don't have corporate clients, are getting hit
hard.

As an example, I can do development, although the big picture is my
preferred thing, but I can't buy a development interview, let alone a gig.

And even though I am a licensed realtor, contrary to what you are reading in
the media, real estate is NOT moving, except maybe where the big
corporations are, or where the hedge funds are investing.


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:19 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: ProFox List Statistics for April 2013

On May 20, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox)
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>> Q3: What do you use VFP for?
>>>        New application development: 55.00%
> 
> Especially this one. I really have to question whether this makes 
> sense today, but that is an entirely different matter.
> 
> Sorry for projecting my own situation onto others.

        Nah, that one took me by surprise, too. Maybe in a company with a
cadre of seasoned VFP developers, but for independent projects, I can't
understand this either.


-- Ed Leafe






[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to