On 06/24/2013 10:02 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
On 6/24/2013 8:19 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Richard: That is the first thing I did. I use Stonefield and it did
not correct the problem. I don't know why and even if it was table
corruption. It was a very strange problem. After the file was packed
it still had one deleted record. I could USE the file and browse it
just fine. I did a pack from the command window and that solved the
problem.
We used SDT at Sylvan and I could have swore I saw some cases where
the SDT pack didn't seem to work either (as evidenced by records still
marked for delete afterwards). I ended up writing my own to cycle
through and do a PACK explicitly too.
Michael: I think this was a case where the dbf header said zero records
even though there was a deleted record in the table. I think?!?
Thanks,
Jeff
---------------
Jeff Johnson
[email protected]
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
www.arelationshipmanager.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
