> Heya Mr. A.

And a heya to you, Mr S. !
 
> Ya - moving can be a PITA, hope you are able to jack in 
> quickly and be productive again.
> 
> I guess my point was that you were mentioning that MS _could_ 
> have taken VFP features and put them into other toolsets.  
> Well, they did that _already_. I gave you three examples.

> I'm with you - on those 3 things I mentioned - I don't see 
> using them directly with VFP to enhance internal VFP stuff.  
> Is it bait ? Possibly. 


Bill, I'm really hoping that some champions in MS mgmt realize they
shouldn't mess with a tradition; that they have an important
responsibility to people already committed to VFP (and who don't like
being baited); and with the world shrinking as it is, there is more then
enough to go around for all of their product lines. 


> Could they be useful for VFP developers who aren't getting in 
> any other VFP stuff and are making a switchover to another 
> toolset? Sure. I try to stay aware of 'them things' that are 
> coming up, to do some kind of technology forecasting for 'the 
> next thing I need to learn and disseminate' .  I'm not 
> joining in with 'that camp'.

> You got a good place to hide that RV on LI ? I hear there be 
> some interesting zoning laws there.  At least you'll be a tad 
> closer to more 'cultural' things - so thats always good.

The RV's history now. Gave it to one of my sons, who has space for it
and can take his time deciding what he will do with it. 

Yeah, I'm on Long Island now. You're right about the cultural things,
but ... well, first things first. 


Bill
 
> Regards [Bill]
> -- 
> William Sanders / efGroup 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to