Tracy:  I use VMP and there is a way to run any form in standalone mode.  It
runs in the IDE just like it would in your application.  It is a very nice
feature, but if the form errors out; I occasionally get that problem.  If I
run a form in the IDE, I make a backup first.  When I make a lot of changes,
I build the application and run it from production mode.

Jeff

Jeff Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
623-582-0323
Fax 623-869-0675

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VFP8: Missing Code...Again...

Now I know why I haven't seen it in forever.
I don't run forms in my programming IDE session.
I run them in a test IDE session running from the code.

Tracy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Johnson
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:26 PM
>
> Jack:  I've been using VFP9 and have had this happen quite a
> bit.  I traced it to this:  When running a form in the VFP
> environment I get an error.  If I save the form, it will save
> some of the methods in the wrong place.  Ie: the init code
> will be in the click code and the click code will be in the
> init.  Initially I would save the form and have to go back
> and move everything around.
>
> What I do now, is when I get an error when running a form, I
> quit FoxPro and start it up.  The form will be fine when
> re-opening FoxPro.
>
> It appears to me that the index of the form gets messed up
> when there is an error.  I have never seen this is VFP7 and I
> have it under control in VFP9.
>
> Jeff




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to