On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What did end up working was creating a aggregate cursor of catx then > selecting out only what I wanted. I probably lost a good optimisation > possibility, but I got my answers. > > SQL is not very well designed. > ----------------------------- No I'll go with user error first. Saw this start up and got a help ticket, to find poor sql sub-select of top 1 not sorted properly. Did you just do a distinct on what was there without a join to get your proper starting point? Then compare that rowcount against your lookup table for the descriptions? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmylnjky2z_w6l8vgclwoqr6obazkvjagce4bdjvmnqh...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
