On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:36 PM, [email protected]
<[email protected]>wrote:


> We would like to write all the web site software using something like
> python (I really don't know much about it but I see people on this list are
> using it.) I would like to see comments from anyone who has done this -
> either positive or negative. Even recommend a better way to do it? (PHP,
> etc?)
>

Python, PHP or Ruby, or even Perl, are all languages which can do pretty
much anything. They already run the internet, essentially. It's far more
important to find a practitioner who knows how to use the tools and how to
manage the product, and provide the level of customer service you require.

The web software must be able to accept an xml file from the vfp9 software.
> Search the xml document, pull out some information and do a lookup in a dbf
> file that was created with vfp9. If it finds whatever, it returns an xml
> document to the vfp9 software on the user's computer. Hope that is clear.
>

Why not do this in VFP? Why introduce another technology if you don't need
to?

Alternatively, if you're interested in doing this in a language other than
Fox, I'd strongly push LAMP (I know, everyone's surprised) as it is a
better internet citizen, generally speaking.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4s1An_LVKcNgUcbUB-h+eMJhhinb=CsVaaTYiuHSOf-=q...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to