On May 1, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > But there were messages from the 18th to the 28th!
Yeah, the stats are generated from the archives, and something went bonkers around the 18th, but no one noticed until the 28th. As a result, those days are in limbo for the time being. I don't keep ProFox messages hanging around, but if anyone does and can send me an .mbox or similar for the missing period, I'll see if I can add them back into the archive. -- Ed Leafe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/pgp-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
